19th December 2014
Bad enough when criminal activity and fraud in private life cause emotional pain and suffering – but even worse when the consequences extend far beyond that, endangering the fate of an entire company along with the livelihoods and capital tied to it. Such was the case in a recent incident that left even the detectives of the Kurtz Commercial Investigation Agency Stuttgart nearly speechless in view of its audacity and scale. Thanks to the quick and prudent reaction of the affected company owner, V. Häberle, a serious case of industrial espionage ended relatively well, as he had turned to the Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart in time. This allowed our corporate investigators and IT forensics experts to avert damages worth millions for him and his company.
Häberle is the founder and owner of a medium-sized Swabian company that focuses heavily on fuel cell technology research and development. “A fiercely competitive field,” he explains to our Stuttgart investigators, “fuel cells are considered THE energy converters of the future!” The technology has tremendous advantages, especially in automotive engineering – not unimportant in a region where many of the country’s car manufacturers and suppliers are based.
Innovative companies like Häberle’s, focused on research and development, rely on bringing new technologies to market first – an essential factor for their economic success. The competition is fierce, and moral boundaries appear flexible. Company secrets had been spied on and passed to a competitor. At first, the case seemed straightforward: unsurprisingly, the spy was caught, Häberle says, “He actually has my full trust – though he’s still quite new here …” The employee in question (25) was the son of a personal friend and university colleague, and Häberle had trusted him on that basis alone. The young man, employed only six months, had apparently passed key internal data and research results to a competitor. What was lacking, however, were court-admissible proofs and clarification of certain inconsistencies – both of which the Kurtz Commercial Investigation Agency Stuttgart was tasked with addressing.
Everything initially pointed to a classic case of industrial espionage. Internal checks had shown that the employee had accessed protected company data multiple times from his workstation and copied documents and technical diagrams to a USB stick. The actual transmission appeared to have taken place through other channels – which ones and to whom, the Stuttgart corporate investigators were now to find out.
As the first step, the IT forensics specialists of the Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart were called in. What followed went far beyond typical detective work: to avoid arousing suspicion within the company, Häberle granted our IT experts access to the workstations under the pretext of an external “IT routine check”. This discreet approach prevented mistrust and allowed the suspect to continue “working” as usual – increasing the chances of collecting usable evidence. After days of meticulous work, our IT specialists discovered that the data had been copied to a smartphone. Within legal limits, they were able to trace device usage and identify the IMEI number – which in such cases often allows precise assignment to an individual device.
During the work of the IT forensic specialists of the Kurtz Commercial Investigation Agency Stuttgart, more and more indications began to surface, pointing the case in an entirely new direction: The employee concerned was verifiably absent from the company on at least three occasions during the times when data transfers had taken place. Moreover, the IMEI number in question did not match either his work or private smartphone, as further examinations showed. Now, a new possibility came into focus for our Stuttgart corporate investigators – one that Häberle had not even considered: The suspicion, the commercial investigators reasoned, might have been deliberately directed toward the new employee in order to divert attention and mislead the investigation in case the theft was discovered. The access to other workstations and computer data – originally carried out merely as a cover – quickly yielded a new clue through the regularly connected devices: The smartphone to which the data had been transferred was assigned to an entirely different employee who worked in the neighbouring office! This employee, Mr B. Konrad, had been with the company from the very beginning, and it was now on him that the detectives of the Kurtz Commercial Investigation Agency Stuttgart focused their investigation.
With these new insights, the surveillance of the new target person could begin – and it soon produced results: Konrad, still unaware that he was under investigation and feeling safe, was in regular contact with a nearby company that was also engaged in fuel cell research. Fortunately, the meetings took place outside the premises of either company – otherwise, our commercial investigators would have been limited by privacy protections, which extend to company premises as well. However, under these circumstances, surveillance quickly revealed that Konrad regularly exchanged envelopes with a person later identified as a senior executive of that same company, which was in direct competition with the client of our Stuttgart commercial investigators. Three such meetings were observed and photographically documented by our corporate detectives – all in different locations but uninterruptedly followed.
Now it was up to our investigators to make a decision: The evidence was sufficient to file a complaint, but the success of such a move was far from guaranteed – so perhaps it would be better to confront the target directly? Knowing that the livelihoods of more than 50 employees in Häberle’s company were at stake, the commercial investigators of the Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart decided to confront Konrad personally and alone immediately after the third meeting. Under the weight of the evidence, he quickly broke down: He admitted that he had been an employee in Häberle’s company from the beginning and had long felt passed over for promotions. When, about six months earlier, a representative of the rival company approached him, he had been offered a lucrative deal: he was to obtain documents and sensitive data in exchange for payments in the high four-digit range. Konrad was quite skilled in IT matters but personally dissatisfied with his job.
The malicious idea not only to cover his tracks but also to leave misleading traces pointing to someone else had been entirely Konrad’s own. He showed no remorse for the fact that the young man who had initially come under suspicion had done absolutely nothing wrong and had thus stood unjustly in the focus of the investigation. Fortunately for Häberle and his company, Konrad’s actions did not go undetected thanks to the commercial investigators and IT forensic specialists of the Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart. Sufficient court-admissible evidence could be gathered to make both Konrad and the aforementioned employee of the competing company subject to criminal investigation.
Given the court-admissible video and photographic evidence and the detailed investigation report of the Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart, all requirements were met to bring the industrial spies to justice. Moreover, the investigators prevented a loss worth millions and, not least, cleared the suspicion from an innocent person – who, without this intervention, would almost certainly have lost his job or worse. The innocent employee, however, remains unaware of his luck, as the investigation took place discreetly – demonstrating that beyond all commercial success, it is often the human element that makes our corporate investigators of the Kurtz Commercial Investigation Agency Stuttgart perform their work with true conviction and satisfaction.
Incidentally, the terms economic espionage and industrial espionage are often confused in media reporting, but by definition, they are clearly distinct. The present case represents industrial or competitive espionage – the attempt by a private company to illegally obtain information from a competitor. Economic espionage, on the other hand, is always state-sponsored and typically carried out by intelligence services seeking to compensate for a technological disadvantage compared to other countries.
All names and locations have been completely anonymised to protect clients and target persons.
Author: Gerrit Koehler
Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart | Germany
Königstraße 80
D-70173 Stuttgart
Tel.: +49 711 7153 0028
E-Mail: kontakt@kurtz-detektei-stuttgart.de
Tags: Detective, private detective, investigator, surveillance, Stuttgart, detective agency, Kurtz Detective Agency Stuttgart, commercial investigation agency, corporate investigator, business detective, Detective Agency Kurtz, economic espionage, industrial espionage, corporate espionage, Kurtz IT Service, IT forensics, IT security, smartphone forensics
Kommentare: 3
#1
(Samstag, 20 Dezember 2014 12:43)
Der Originalbeitrag erschien unter https://detekteikurtz.wordpress.com/2014/12/20/werksspionage-in-brennstoffzellenforschung-ein-fall-der-kurtz-wirtschaftsdetektei-stuttgart/.
#2
Detektei in Stuttgart
(Montag, 22 Dezember 2014 14:24)
Auch dieser Fall zeigt einmal mehr, wie spannend und interessant die Arbeit einer Detektei ist. Ohne Ihren Blog könnten Außenstehende nur erahnen, wie vielseitig die Arbeit ist. Weiter so!
Wir würden uns freuen, Sie und ihre Detektei im größten Detektei Verzeichnis Deutschlands begrüßen zu dürfen.
Grüße,
André Schneider von Detektei-finden.de
#3
Aaden Wirtschaftsdetektei Stuttgart
(Montag, 07 September 2015 13:44)
Ein faszinierender Fall, Kollegen! Grüße von der Aaden Detektei Stuttgart!